Set Up- But Do Not Evaluate, An Integral For The Area Of Thesurface Obtained By Rotating The Curve About (2024)

The equation for the hyperbola satisfying the given conditions is: x^2/16 - y^2/b^2 = 1

To find the equation for the hyperbola with the given conditions, we can start by determining the key properties of the hyperbola, namely the center, foci, and vertices.

From the given information, we can observe that the center of the hyperbola is at the origin (0,0) since the foci and vertices are symmetrically placed along the x and y-axes.

Next, let's determine the distance between the center and the foci. The distance between the center and each focus is given as 7 units. We can use this information to determine the value of 'c' in the equation for a hyperbola, which is related to the distance between the center and the foci.

Since the foci are located at (0, ±7), the value of 'c' is 7.

Additionally, we are given the coordinates of the vertices as (0, ±4). The distance between the center and each vertex is 4 units. This distance, along with the value of 'c', allows us to determine the value of 'a' in the equation for a hyperbola, which represents the distance between the center and the vertices.

Since the vertices are located at (0, ±4), the value of 'a' is 4.

Now, we can use the values of 'a' and 'c' to determine the equation for the hyperbola. For a hyperbola centered at the origin, the equation takes the form:

[tex](x^2/a^2) - (y^2/b^2) = 1[/tex]

Substituting the values of 'a' and 'c' into the equation, we have:

[tex](x^2/4^2) - (y^2/b^2) = 1[/tex]

Simplifying further, we get:

[tex]x^2/16 - y^2/b^2 = 1[/tex]

For more such information on: hyperbola

https://brainly.com/question/30281625

#SPJ8

Answer:

41÷2=20.5

Step-by-step explanation:

just think 40 divided by 2 = 20

now 1 divided by 2 = 0.5

just add them together now

I hope this helps you :)

41÷2=20.5

41=40+1
40=2x20
➡️NO 2, CORRECT 20

2x20=40

one remains. After that, you're right.

answer=20.5

0.303 is the answer go to calculator n check

In a trigonal bipyramidal molecular geometry, the approximate bond angles are as follows: axial-xe-axial is 180 degrees, equatorial-xe-equatorial is 120 degrees, and axial-xe-equatorial is 90 degrees. These angles are based on the idealized geometry and provide a general understanding of the molecular arrangement.

In a trigonal bipyramidal molecular geometry, the bond angles can be approximated as follows:

The axial-xe-axial bond angle (between the axial positions) is approximately 180 degrees. This is because the axial positions are directly opposite each other, creating a linear arrangement.

The equatorial-xe-equatorial bond angle (between the equatorial positions) is approximately 120 degrees. This is because the equatorial positions form an equilateral triangle around the central atom, resulting in angles of 120 degrees.

The axial-xe-equatorial bond angle (between an axial position and an equatorial position) is approximately 90 degrees. This is because the axial positions are perpendicular to the equatorial plane.

It's important to note that these angles are approximate values based on the idealized geometry and assume that there are no distortions or interactions present in the molecule.

In reality, bond angles can deviate slightly due to factors such as lone pair repulsions or steric effects. However, for a general understanding of the geometry, these approximations can be useful.

To know more about bond angles refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/31707957#

#SPJ11

a. The price of the consol is approximately $133.33.

b. The new price of the consol would be $100. The price of the consol falls by 24.99% and the interest rate rises by 1%.

c. Your holding period return is approximately -49.99%.

a. The price of the consol can be calculated using the formula for the present value of a perpetuity:

Price = Annual Payment / Interest Rate

In this case, the annual payment is $4 and the interest rate is 3%. Substituting these values into the formula:

Price = $4 / 0.03 ≈ $133.33

Therefore, the price of the consol is approximately $133.33.

b. To calculate the new price of the consol if the interest rate rises to 4%, we use the same formula:

New Price = Annual Payment / New Interest Rate

Substituting the values, we get:

New Price = $4 / 0.04 = $100

The percentage change in the price of the consol can be calculated using the formula:

Percentage Change = (New Price - Old Price) / Old Price * 100

Substituting the values, we have:

Percentage Change in Price = ($100 - $133.33) / $133.33 * 100 ≈ -24.99%

The percentage change in the interest rate is simply the difference between the old and new interest rates:

Percentage Change in Interest Rate = (4% - 3%) = 1%

Comparing the two percentages, we can see that the price of the consol falls by approximately 24.99%, while the interest rate rises by 1%.

c. The holding period return can be calculated using the formula:

Holding Period Return = (Ending Value - Initial Value) / Initial Value * 100

The initial value is the purchase price of the consol, which is $133.33, and the ending value is the price of the consol after one year with an interest rate of 6%. Using the formula for the present value of a perpetuity, we can calculate the ending value:

Ending Value = Annual Payment / Interest Rate = $4 / 0.06 = $66.67

Substituting the values into the holding period return formula:

Holding Period Return = ($66.67 - $133.33) / $133.33 * 100 ≈ -49.99%

Therefore, the holding period return is approximately -49.99%.

Learn more about holding period

brainly.com/question/32568151

#SPJ11

The value of 10x + 3, when x satisfies the equation 5x + 6 = 10, is 11.

To find the value of 10x + 3, we first need to solve the equation 5x + 6 = 10 for x. Then, we can substitute the obtained value of x into 10x + 3 to find its value.

Let's solve the equation 5x + 6 = 10:

5x = 10 - 6

5x = 4

x = 4/5

Now, substitute the value of x into 10x + 3:

10(4/5) + 3

(40/5) + 3

8 + 3 = 11

Therefore, the value of 10x + 3, when x satisfies the equation 5x + 6 = 10, is 11.

Complete Question:

If 5x+6=10, what is the value of 10x+3?

To know more about equation, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/29278673

#SPJ4

The probability of having three successes out of nine trials with probability of success being 0.60 is approximately 0.250.

To determine P(x=3) in a binomial situation where n=9 and π=0.60, we can use the formula for the probability mass function of a binomial distribution:

P(x=k) =[tex](n choose k) * π^k * (1-π)^(^n^-^k^)[/tex]

where "n choose k" is the binomial coefficient, which represents the number of ways to choose k items from a set of n items.

Substituting the given values in the formula, we obtain:

P(x=3) = (9 choose 3) * 0.60^3 * 0.40^6 = (9!/(3!6!)) * 0.216 * 0.04096 ≈ 0.250

For such more questions on probability

https://brainly.com/question/251701

#SPJ8

The value of the 10-year expected real interest rate decreased from 3.8% to 1.89%.

When the federal funds rate changed from 5.5% to 3.5%, it lowered the cost of borrowing money for banks, which, in turn, lowered the interest rates on loans and mortgages for consumers and businesses. As a result, the demand for goods and services increased, and the economy grew, leading to an increase in inflation expectations

.The new nominal interest rate can be calculated as

Nominal interest rate = Real interest rate + Expected inflation rate

Nominal interest rate = 1.89% + 1.7% = 3.59%

Therefore, the 10-year nominal interest rate decreased from 5.5% to 3.59%

.The 10-year expected real interest rate is the expected rate of return on an investment adjusted for inflation. It reflects the expected real cost of borrowing money or the real return on lending money over the next ten years.

The expected real interest rate depends on the expected future inflation rate and the market's risk premium.

The formula for the expected real interest rate is

:Expected real interest rate = Nominal interest rate - Expected inflation rate

If the 10-year nominal interest rate was 5.5% and the expected inflation rate was 1.7%, then the expected real interest rate was 5.5% - 1.7% = 3.8%

When the federal funds rate changed from 5.5% to 3.5%, it lowered the nominal interest rate and lowered the expected inflation rate due to increased economic activity and inflation expectations

The new expected real interest rate can be calculated as:

Expected real interest rate = Nominal interest rate - Expected inflation rate

Expected real interest rate = 3.59% - 1.7% = 1.89%

Therefore, the 10-year expected real interest rate decreased from 3.8% to 1.89%.

Learn more about interest rate at https://brainly.com/question/32457439

#SPJ11

Answer:

option 6b):) is correct

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the smallest possible difference between two different nine-digit integers that include all the digits 1 to 9, we can start by arranging the digits in ascending order to form the smaller number and in descending order to form the larger number.

The smallest possible nine-digit integer that includes all the digits 1 to 9 is 123456789, and the largest possible nine-digit integer is 987654321.

To calculate the difference, we subtract the smaller number from the larger number is

987654321 - 123456789 = 864197532

Therefore, the smallest possible difference between two different nine-digit integers, each of which includes all the digits 1 to 9, is 864,197,532

Final answer:

In number theory, the smallest possible difference between two different nine-digit integers, each of which includes all of the digits from 1 to 9, is 1.

Explanation:

The subject matter of this question belongs to Mathematics, specifically, number theory. The smallest possible difference between two different nine-digit integers, each of which includes all of the digits 1 to 9, is 1. For instance, consider the two numbers

123456789

and

123456790

. Both numbers use each of the digits 1 to 9 once. The difference between these two numbers is 123456790 - 123456789 = 1. This is the smallest difference that can be achieved under the given conditions.

Learn more about Number Theory here:

https://brainly.com/question/30414700

#SPJ2

Answer: 540 in^2

Step-by-step explanation: Find each area of each shape, then add them up to find the surface area of the triangular prism. The rectangle on the top would be 13 x 16 = 208 in^2. The rectangle in the middle would be 12 x 16 = 192 in^2. The triangles would add up to 60 in^2 since (12 x 5)/2 x 2 is 60. The rectangle on the bottom would be 5 x 16 = 80 in^2.

Given statement solution is :- Rounding up to the nearest whole number, it will take approximately 405 more days for the album to be awarded gold certification.

To determine the number of days it will take for the album to be awarded gold certification, we need to calculate how many more albums the artist needs to sell.

Gold certification in the United States requires at least 500,000 albums sold. The artist has already sold 15,000 albums. Therefore, the number of albums they still need to sell is:

500,000 - 15,000 = 485,000 albums

Since the artist is selling about 1,200 albums each day, we can calculate the number of days it will take to reach the remaining number of albums:

485,000 / 1,200 ≈ 404.17

Rounding up to the nearest whole number, it will take approximately 405 more days for the album to be awarded gold certification.

For such more questions on Album Gold Certification Estimation

https://brainly.com/question/13681673

#SPJ8

Answer:

B) 14

Step-by-step explanation:

A stem and leaf plot is a method to plot data where the data is spilt into stems (largest digit) and leaves (the smallest digit).

Drivers who travel below 80 miles per hour are:

5 is the stem and 4, 6, 9 are the leaves. So, the data is:

54, 56, 59

6 is the stem and 2, 2, 3, 4, 8 are the leaves. So, the data is:

62 ,62, 63, 64, 68

7 is the stem and 0, 0, 1, 2, 2, 3 are the leaves. So, the data is:

70, 70, 71, 72, 72, 73

14 drivers.

Answer:

This is a geometric series with first term .417 and common ratio .001, so the sum is:

S = .417/(1 - .001) = .417/.999 = 417/999

= 139/333

1.1.1 With just 2 and 3 cents denominations, all odd numbers can be created. If you have x number of 2 cent stamps and y number of 3 cent stamps then the value of the stamp will be 2x+3y cents. Using these stamps, the possible combinations are:{2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, ...}.

The conductor of this set is 6 since you can't create 1, 2 or 5 using these two stamps.5. The proof for {2, 3} and {2, 4} sets can be obtained in the following way: Let n be any natural number not in the form of 2x + 3y. We will prove that such a number n cannot exist. If n is odd, then n-2 will be even and n-3 will be odd. We can then express n-2 and n-3 as 2x1 + 3y1 and 2x2 + 3y2 respectively, which gives us n = 2(x1+1) + 3y1 and n = 2x2 + 3(y2+1). This implies that n can be expressed in the form of 2x + 3y. If n is even, then n can be expressed as n = 2x3 + 3y3.

Therefore, any number not in the form of 2x + 3y cannot exist. 6. For the {3,5} set, the possible combinations are:{3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, ...}The conductor of this set is 1 since you can't create 3 using these two stamps.7. The pattern in the conductors is not clear. However, it can be proven that the conductor for all pairs (3, n) is 2 for all n. It can also be proven that the conductor for all pairs (4, n) is 1 for all n. This implies that as the numbers increase, their conductors tend to decrease.

To know more about stamps visit :

https://brainly.com/question/22056874

#SPJ11

The derivative [tex]\( y' \)[/tex] of the implicit function [tex]\( y^2 - xy = -2 \)[/tex] is 0, indicating a constant slope with no change in relation to [tex]\( x \)[/tex].

To find [tex]\( y' \)[/tex]for the implicit function [tex]\( y^2 - xy = -2 \)[/tex], we can differentiate both sides of the equation with respect to [tex]\( x \)[/tex] using the chain rule. Let's go step by step:

Differentiating [tex]\( y^2 \)[/tex] with respect to [tex]\( x \)[/tex] using the chain rule:

[tex]\[\frac{d}{dx}(y^2) = 2y \cdot \frac{dy}{dx}\][/tex]

Differentiating [tex]\( xy \)[/tex] with respect to [tex]\( x \)[/tex] using the product rule:

[tex]\[\frac{d}{dx}(xy) = x \cdot \frac{dy}{dx} + y \cdot \frac{dx}{dx} = x \cdot \frac{dy}{dx} + y\][/tex]

Differentiating the constant term (-2) with respect to [tex]\( x \)[/tex] gives us zero since it's a constant.

So, the differentiation of the entire equation is:

[tex]\[2y \cdot \frac{dy}{dx} - (x \cdot \frac{dy}{dx} + y) = 0\][/tex]

Now, let's rearrange the terms:

[tex]\[(2y - y) \cdot \frac{dy}{dx} - x \cdot \frac{dy}{dx} = 0\][/tex]

Simplifying further:

[tex]\[y \cdot \frac{dy}{dx}[/tex] [tex]- x \cdot \frac{dy}{dx} = 0\][/tex]

Factoring out:

[tex]\[(\frac{dy}{dx})(y - x) = 0 \][/tex]

Finally, solving:

[tex]\[\frac{dy}{dx} = \frac{0}{y - x} = 0\][/tex]

Therefore, the derivative [tex]\( y' \)[/tex] of the given implicit function is 0.

Learn more about derivative

brainly.com/question/29144258

#SPJ11

The linearization of the function f(x) = x⁴ + 6x² at a = 1 is L(x) = 16x - 9.

The linearization of the function f(x) = x⁴ + 6x² at a = 1, we need to calculate the value of the function and its derivative at x = 1.

First, let's find the value of the function at x = 1:

f(1) = 1⁴ + 6(1)² = 1 + 6 = 7

Next, let's find the derivative of the function:

f'(x) = 4x³ + 12x

Now, we can use the point-slope form of a linear equation to find the linearization:

L(x) = f(a) + f'(a)(x - a)

Substituting the values, we have:

L(x) = 7 + (4(1)³ + 12(1))(x - 1)

Simplifying further:

L(x) = 7 + (4 + 12)(x - 1)

L(x) = 7 + 16(x - 1)

L(x) = 7 + 16x - 16

L(x) = 16x - 9

Therefore, the linearization of the function f(x) = x⁴ + 6x² at a = 1 is L(x) = 16x - 9.

To know more about linearization click here :

https://brainly.com/question/32776166

#SPJ4

The utility functions in options a, b, c, and f are not risk-averse on the interval [a,b], while the utility functions in options d and e are risk-averse on the interval [a,b].

In economics and finance, risk aversion refers to a preference for less risky options over riskier ones. Utility functions are mathematical representations of an individual's preferences, and they help determine whether someone is risk-averse, risk-neutral, or risk-seeking. A risk-averse individual would have a concave utility function, indicating a decreasing marginal utility of wealth.

For options a, b, c, and f, the utility functions are and f(x) = -ln(x), g(x) = [tex]-e^(^-^x^)[/tex], h(x) = [tex]-4x^2[/tex] - 10x, respectively. These utility functions do not exhibit concavity, which means they are not risk-averse. Instead, they either show risk-seeking behavior (options a and b) or risk-neutrality (options c and f).

On the other hand, options d and e have utility functions f(x) = ln(x), g(x) = 1/(e^(2x)), h(x) = [tex]-x^2[/tex] + 10,000x and f(x) = ln(-2x), g(x) = -1/([tex]e^(^2^x^)[/tex]), h(x) = [tex]x^2[/tex] - 100,000x, respectively. These utility functions display concavity, indicating a decreasing marginal utility of wealth. Thus, options d and e can be considered risk-averse on the interval [a,b].

Learn more about risk-averse

brainly.com/question/30641789

#SPJ11

Answer:

80 miles

Step-by-step explanation:

15 minutes × (1 hour)/(60 minutes) = 0.25 hour

speed = distance/time

distance = speed × time

distance = 320 miles/hour × 0.25 hour

distance = 80 miles

The correct matches are:

(2)/(3) = (30)/(45) -> True

(1)/(5) = (4)/(25) -> False

(7)/(12) = (35)/(60) -> True

(3)/(4) = (36)/(44) -> False

The proportions given are:

(2)/(3) = (30)/(45)

(1)/(5) = (4)/(25)

(7)/(12) = (35)/(60)

(3)/(4) = (36)/(44)

To determine whether each proportion is true or false, we need to simplify both sides of the equation and compare the results.

(2)/(3) simplifies to 2/3, and (30)/(45) simplifies to 2/3. This proportion is true.

(1)/(5) simplifies to 1/5, but (4)/(25) simplifies to 4/25. This proportion is false.

(7)/(12) simplifies to 7/12, and (35)/(60) simplifies to 7/12. This proportion is true.

(3)/(4) simplifies to 3/4, but (36)/(44) simplifies to 9/11. This proportion is false.

Learn more about proportion here:

https://brainly.com/question/31548894

#SPJ4

The rule for the nth term of the sequence is f(n) = -432(1/6)ⁿ ⁻ ¹

Finding the explicit rule for the sequence

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

a(2) = -72

a(6) = -1/18

The common ratio is calculated as

r⁴ = a(6)/a(2)

So, we have

r⁴ = (-1/18)/(-72)

Evaluate

r⁴ = 1/(18 * 72)

Take the fourth root of both sides

r = 1/6

So, we have

a = -72/(1/6)

Evaluate

a = -432

The nth term is then represented as

f(n) = arⁿ ⁻ ¹

Substitute the known values in the above equation, so, we have the following representation

f(n) = -432(1/6)ⁿ ⁻ ¹

Hence, the explicit rule is f(n) = -432(1/6)ⁿ ⁻ ¹

Read more about sequence at

brainly.com/question/30499691

#SPJ1

The final radius of the bubble at the surface is approximately 1.414 cm.

We have,

To determine the final radius of the bubble at the surface, we can use the ideal gas law, which states that the product of pressure and volume is proportional to the product of the number of moles and temperature.

Given:

Initial radius ([tex]r_1[/tex]) = 2.40 cm

Initial pressure ([tex]P_1[/tex]) = 3.15 bars

Initial temperature ([tex]T_1[/tex]) = 8.68 °C

Final pressure ([tex]P_2[/tex]) = 1.01325 bars

Final temperature ([tex]T_2[/tex]) = 20.32 °C

To convert the temperatures to Kelvin, we add 273.15 to each value:

T1 = 8.68 + 273.15 = 281.83 K

T2 = 20.32 + 273.15 = 293.47 K

Using the ideal gas law equation:

[tex]P_1 \times V_1 / T_1 = P_2 \times V_2 / T_2[/tex]

Since the volume is proportional to the cube of the radius, we can rewrite the equation as:

[tex]P_1 \times r_1^3 / T_1 = P_2 \times r_2^3 / T_2[/tex]

Solving for [tex]r_2[/tex] (final radius):

[tex]r_2 = (P_2 \times r_1^3 \times T_2) / (P_1 \times T_1)[/tex]

Substituting the given values:

[tex]r_2[/tex] = (1.01325 x (2.40 cm)³ x 293.47 K) / (3.15 x 281.83 K)

Calculating the final radius:

[tex]r_2[/tex] ≈ 1.414 cm

Therefore,

The final radius of the bubble at the surface is approximately 1.414 cm.

Learn more about gas law here:

https://brainly.com/question/30935329

#SPJ4

The population in the study is all bottles of apple juice filled on October 22.

The population in the study refers to the entire set of units that possess the specific characteristics of interest in a study.

In this case, the quality-control manager randomly selects 20 bottles of apple juice that were filled on October 22 to evaluate the calibration of the filling machine.In the given scenario, the population is the entire set of bottles of apple juice that were filled on October 22. This is because the manager wants to evaluate the calibration of the filling machine used on that day.

Therefore, the population in the study is all bottles of apple juice filled on October 22. The sample in this case is the 20 bottles of apple juice that were randomly selected by the quality-control manager to assess the calibration of the filling machine.

Know more about population here,

https://brainly.com/question/15889243

#SPJ11

Answer:

cosPcosQ - sinPsinQ

Step-by-step explanation:

using the addition identity

• cos(x + y) = cosxcosy - sinxsiny

then

cos(P + Q) = cosPcosQ - sinPsinQ

The volume of the solid generated when the region bounded by the graph of y = 2x, the x-axis, and the vertical line x = 3 is revolved about the x-axis is 36π cubic units.

To determine the volume of the solid generated by revolving the region bounded by the graph of y = 2x, the x-axis, and the vertical line x = 3 about the x-axis, we can use the method of cylindrical shells.

The integral expression for the volume is given by:

V = ∫[a, b] 2πx * f(x) * dx

In this case, the region is bounded by x = 0 (the x-axis) and x = 3 (the vertical line), so the limits of integration are a = 0 and b = 3.

The function f(x) represents the distance between the curve y = 2x and the x-axis at each x-value.

Since the curve is y = 2x, the distance between the curve and the x-axis is simply 2x.

Substituting this into the integral expression, we have:

V = ∫[0, 3] 2πx * (2x) * dx

V = 4π ∫[0, 3] x^2 dx

To evaluate this integral, we can use the power rule for integration:

V = 4π * [x^3/3] evaluated from 0 to 3

V = 4π * [(3^3/3) - (0^3/3)]

V = 4π * (27/3)

V = 36π

To know more about volume refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/32768584#

#SPJ11

The probability that x=0 in a Poisson distribution with µ = 0.3 is approximately 0.7408.

In a Poisson distribution, the probability mass function (PMF) is given by P(x; µ) = (e^(-µ) * µ^x) / x!, where x is the number of events occurring, and µ is the average rate of events.

To find the probability that x=0, we substitute x=0 into the PMF formula:

P(0; 0.3) = (e^(-0.3) * 0.3^0) / 0!

Since any number raised to the power of 0 is 1 and 0! is 1, the equation simplifies to:

P(0; 0.3) = e^(-0.3)

Using a calculator, we find that e^(-0.3) is approximately 0.7408.

The probability that x=0 in a Poisson distribution with µ = 0.3 is approximately 0.7408. This means that there is a 74.08% chance of observing no events when the average rate of events is 0.3.

To know more about probability, visit;
https://brainly.com/question/32004014

#SPJ11

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the time of the commercial plane ride from Vancouver to Regina, we can follow these steps:

Step 1: Determine the speed of the commercial airplane.

Since the jet plane travels two times the speed of the commercial airplane, we can let the speed of the commercial airplane be 'x' km/h. Therefore, the speed of the jet plane would be 2x km/h.

Step 2: Calculate the time taken by the jet plane.

Using the formula Time = Distance / Speed, we can calculate the time taken by the jet plane.

The distance between Vancouver and Regina is 1,730 km, and the speed of the jet plane is 2x km/h. Therefore, the time taken by the jet plane is:

Time _ jet = 1730 km / (2x km/h) = 865 / x hours.

Step 3: Calculate the time taken by the commercial airplane.

According to the problem, the commercial airplane takes 140 minutes longer than the jet plane. We need to convert this additional time to hours.

140 minutes = 140/60 = 2.33 hours.

The time taken by the commercial airplane would be the time taken by the jet plane plus the additional 2.33 hours:

Time _ commercial = Time _ jet + 2.33 hours = (865 / x) hours + 2.33 hours.

Step 4: Solve for the time of the commercial plane ride.

Now, we need to find the value of 'x' that satisfies the given conditions. Since we know that the distance between Vancouver and Regina is 1,730 km, we can set up the following equation:

(865 / x) hours + 2.33 hours = Time _ commercial.

By substituting the known values, we have:

(865 / x) hours + 2.33 hours = Time _ commercial.

Solving this equation will give us the value of 'x' and, subsequently, the time of the commercial plane ride from Vancouver to Regina.

The equation 0.9c + 1.89r = 17.01 is not equivalent to 0.9c + 1.897 = 17.01.

To show that the equation 0.9c + 1.897 = 17.01 is equivalent to 0.9c + 1.89r = 17.01, we can manipulate the given equation to obtain the desired form.

Starting with the given equation:

0.9c + 1.897 = 17.01

We can subtract 1.897 from both sides of the equation to isolate 0.9c:

0.9c = 17.01 - 1.897

Simplifying the right side of the equation:

0.9c = 15.113

Now, let's substitute the value of r into the equation. We know that the cost of ribs is given by 1.89r, so we can rewrite the equation as:

0.9c + 1.89r = 15.113 + 1.89r

Next, we want to show that 15.113 + 1.89r is equal to 17.01. To do that, we need to show that 15.113 is equal to 17.01 - 1.89r.

Let's simplify the right side of the equation:

15.113 = 17.01 - 1.89r

We can rewrite this equation as:

15.113 = 17.01 - 1

By comparing this equation to the given equation, we can see that they are not equivalent. Therefore, the equation 0.9c + 1.89r = 17.01 is not equivalent to 0.9c + 1.897 = 17.01.

for such more question on equivalent

https://brainly.com/question/2328454

#SPJ8

The required integration is,

⇒ F(x) = - ∑(n+1) (n+1) (1 / (5n + 5)) [tex]x^{(5n+5)}[/tex] + C

The given series expansion of f is,

f(x) = -5x⁴ / (1 - x⁵)²

We can rewrite this as,

f(x) = -5x⁴ [tex](1 - x^5)^{(-2)}[/tex]

Now, we can use the binomial series expansion to write (1 - x^5)^(-2) as a series,

[tex](1 - x^5)^{(-2)}[/tex] = ∑(n+1) (n+1) [tex]x^{(5n)}[/tex]

Substituting this back into our original expression for f(x), we get,

f(x) = -5x⁴∑(n+1) (n+1) [tex]x^{(5n)}[/tex]

Now, we can integrate each term of this series expansion term-by-term from 0 to x to obtain the series expansion for the indefinite integral of f,

⇒ F(x) = ∫ f(x) dx = - ∑(n+1) (n+1) ∫ x⁴ [tex]x^{(5n)}[/tex] dx

Integrating each term, we get,

⇒ F(x) = - ∑(n+1) (n+1) (1 / (5n + 5)) [tex]x^{(5n+5)}[/tex] + C

where C is the constant of integration.

To learn more about integration visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31744185

#SPJ4

Using the first three Taylor polynomials for f(x) = 1 + x centered at 0, the three approximations to 1.1 are 1, 1.55, and 1.3975. These values are obtained by substituting 1.1 into each polynomial.

To determine three approximations to 1.1 using the first three Taylor polynomials for f(x) = 1 + x centered at 0, we can substitute x = 1.1 into each polynomial.

For P0:

P0 = 1

Approximation to 1.1 using P0 is 1.

For P1:

P1 = 1 + x/2

Substituting x = 1.1:

P1 ≈ 1 + 1.1/2

P1 ≈ 1 + 0.55

Approximation to 1.1 using P1 is 1.55.

For P2:

P2 = 1 + x/2 - x^2/8

Substituting x = 1.1:

P2 ≈ 1 + 1.1/2 - (1.1)^2/8

P2 ≈ 1 + 0.55 - 0.1525

Approximation to 1.1 using P2 is 1.3975.

Therefore, the three approximations to 1.1 using the first three Taylor polynomials for f(x) = 1 + x centered at 0 are:

1, 1.55, and 1.3975.

To know more about Taylor polynomials refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30551664#

#SPJ11